Insurance, Banking, Construction & Government: Friday, 22 April 2016
For the best view, please download images or click here
AR Conolly Company Lawyers.
A daily Bulletin listing our choice of Decisions of Superior Courts of Australia.

Daily Composite

Insurance, Banking, Construction & Government

  Watch Benchmark Television
  Listen to the Summary
CIVIL (Insurance, Banking, Construction & Government)
Executive Summary (One Minute Read)
Concrete Mining Structures Pty Ltd v Cellcrete Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) (FCA) - security for costs - applications for security for costs by parties against each other - all applications dismissed (I B C)
Aravanis & Roy (Trustees), in the matter of Destanovic (Bankrupt) v Destanovic (FCA) - bankruptcy - property subject to a charge under s139ZR(1) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) - trustees of bankrupt estate had power to sell property - declaration and orders (I B)
Tanious v South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (NSWCA) - notice of motion - coronial inquest - no jurisdiction to review other judge's orders - no arguable basis to order coronial inquest into death of applicant's father - motion dismissed (I B)
Richtoll Pty Ltd v WW Lawyers (in Liquidation) Pty Ltd (NSWSC) - professional negligence - contract - solicitors' duties - failure to conduct further ASIC search just before draw down of loan was breach of duty/retainer - causation not established (I B C G)
Penfold v Predny (NSWSC) - succession - family provision - application by child of deceased for further provision from deceased's Will - application dismissed (B)
Special Broadcasting Service Corporation v Andrew Corbett (NSWSC) - interlocutory injunction - employment contract - confidentiality - interlocutory injunction restraining respondent from working for ABC until outcome of proceedings granted (I B)
Tenney v Matthews (SASC) - contract - joint venture - no breach of settlement agreement - breach of loan agreement - judgment for defendants (I B C)
Benchmark Television
Dear Subscriber

1. This Benchmark Television broadcast is with Stephen Keim SC and Kevin Connor SC on Assault and False Imprisonment by the State.

2. The Queensland Court of Appeal’s decision that the arrest of a Palm Island resident was unlawful explains the state of mind required by the arresting officer for an arrest to be lawful.

3. For Benchmark CLE subscribers we have prepared notes which we will forward to them at their request.

4. Also for Benchmark CLE subscribers at their request we will forward them an advice notice evidencing when they accessed this production.

5. If you are not a CLE subscriber you can subscribe here: https://benchmarkinc.com.au/cle

6. We also have a series of questions for Benchmark CLE subscribers which we will send to them at their request.

7. We will be in the next few days publishing some productions which are exclusively for Benchmark CLE subscribers.

8. You should watch on Wi-Fi to avoid excess data usage charges.

Warm regards
Alan Conolly for Benchmark
ARC signature.
Click here to watch the video
 
Stephen Keim SC and Kevin Connor SC discuss Assault and False Imprisonment by the State
The Queensland Court of Appeal’s decision that the arrest of a Palm Island resident was unlawful explains the state of mind required by the arresting officer for an arrest to be lawful.
Summaries With Link (Five Minute Read)
Concrete Mining Structures Pty Ltd v Cellcrete Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 360
Federal Court of Australia
Edelman J
Security for costs - fiduciary duties - duties of confidence - copyright - unjust enrichment - Barnes v Addy - principal claim arising out of development of pump for mining industry - company (CMS) sued its former director and company of which former director was sole director (Cellcrete) - Cellcrete and former director brought cross-claim - parties sought security for costs against each other - ss1335 & 1335(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - s56 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) - r19.01 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) - held: applications dismissed - Court did not doubt Cellcrete and CMS had funds to meet costs order - even if Cellcrete and CMS did not have sufficient funds difference not significant and Court would not exercise discretion to order security.
Concrete MIning (I B C)
Aravanis & Roy (Trustees), in the matter of Destanovic (Bankrupt) v Destanovic [2016] FCA 388
Federal Court of Australia
Farrell J
Bankruptcy - Federal Circuit Court of Australia made sequestration order against bankrupt's estate - applicants appointed trustees of bankrupt estate - bankrupt's wife was respondent - bankrupt had transferred joint tenancy interest in home to respondent - applicants sought declaration that property was subject to charge under s139ZR(6) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), and orders for sale of property and distribution of proceeds - application sought in order to enforce Notice issued under s139ZQ - held: declaration as to amounts payable under Notice was justified - property subject to a charge under s139ZR(1) - applicants had power to sell property - declaration and orders.
Aravanis (I B)
Tanious v South Eastern Sydney Local Health District [2016] NSWCA 83
Court of Appeal of New South Wales
Basten JA
Notice of motion - coronial inquest - applicant had proceedings on foot in common law division - Wilson J refused applicant leave to file and serve further amended statement of claim and ordered applicant to pay defendants' costs - applicant sought review of Wilson J's judgment and order for inquest into father's death - s84 Coroners Act 2009 (NSW) - held: no jurisdiction to review judgment and orders of another judge - Court's jurisdiction was appellate - applicant had not sought leave to appeal - Court had power to order an inquest but no arguable basis for making order identified - motion dismissed.
Tanious (I B)
Richtoll Pty Ltd v WW Lawyers (in Liquidation) Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 438
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Hoeben CJ at CL
Professional negligence - contract - solicitors' duties - plaintiffs in business of lending money secured by property - plaintiffs were former clients who sued incorporated legal practice for professional negligence and breach of contract in relation to provision of services concerning loans - ss5B, 5D, 5E & 5O Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) - held: plaintiffs made out case for breach of duty/retainer in relation to loan for failure to conduct further ASIC search just before draw down of loan - no defence established under s5O - however causation not established - judgment for defendant.
Richtoll (I B C G)
Penfold v Predny [2016] NSWSC 472
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Hallen J
Succession - family provision - plaintiff child of deceased made claim for family provision out of deceased's estate pursuant to Pt 3.2 Succession Act 2006 (NSW) - plaintiff sought provision which was greater than that provided for her in Will - held: Court not satisfied for purposes of s59(1)(c) that adequate provision for proper maintenance and advancement of plaintiff not made by deceased - Court had no jurisdiction to order further provision from deceased's estate - summons dismissed.
Penfold (B)
Special Broadcasting Service Corporation v Andrew Corbett [2016] NSWSC 461
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Slattery J
Interlocutory injunction - employment contract - confidential information - SBS challenged validity of respondent's resignation - SBS sought interlocutory injunction against respondent to restrain him from working for ABC or other media organisation for remaining during of employment agreement, and to prevent respondent from disclosing SBS's confidential information, until final hearing of proceedings - held: Court concluded that it was appropriate to impose restraint on respondent providing services to ABC or other media organisation and to restrain him from misusing confidential information - respondent's undertaking regarding confidentiality may suffice - orders.
Special Broadcasting Service (I B)
Tenney v Matthews [2016] SASC 34
Supreme Court of South Australia
Bampton J
Contract - joint venture - plaintiff and defendants were joint venturers - following mediation parties executed agreements settling matters in dispute and separating interests - plaintiff alleged breaches of settlement agreement seeking damages from defendants - defendants denied breach of settlement agreement and counterclaimed concerning alleged breaches of vendor loan agreement - defendants sought damages in amount of loan and enforcement of security over plaintiffs mining lease - ss6, 9, 9AA, 20, 21, 22, 26, 34, 35, 39, 73A & 73B Mining Act 1971 (SA) - regs12 & 29 Mining Regulations 2012 (SA) - held: no breach of settlement agreement - defendants established breach of loan agreement - defendants entitled to damages - judgment for defendants.
Tenney (I B C)
CRIMINAL
Executive Summary
RB v R (NSWCCA) - criminal law - sexual offences - indecency - no miscarriage of justice by Crown raising issue of motive to lie - appeal dismissed
Sweetman v Tasmania (TASCCA) - criminal law - trafficking controlled substance - sentence not manifestly excessive - appeal dismissed
Summaries With Link
RB v R [2016] NSWCCA 62
Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales
Ward JA; Price & Adamson JJ
Criminal law - indecency - sexual offences towards complainant daughter aged between 10 and 16 years - appellant was convicted of five counts on indictment: - appellant contended on appeal that “There was a miscarriage of justice as a result of the Crown's address effectively inviting the jury to reason, ‘why would they lie?'” - r4 Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW) - R v Jovanovic direction - held: trial judge “amply and correctly” directed jury concerning onus of proof and need for jury to be satisfied “beyond reasonable doubt of the truth of the complainant's evidence” - no miscarriage of justice or error established - appeal dismissed.
RB
Sweetman v Tasmania [2016] TASCCA 5
Court of Criminal Appeal of Tasmania
Wood, Estcourt & Pearce JJ
Criminal law - appellant pleaded guilty to trafficking controlled substance namely cannabis - sentence of 10 months' imprisonment imposed with 3 months to be served - balance of sentence conditionally suspended - appellant contended sentence was manifestly excessive - mitigatory factors - appellant's personal circumstances - whether sentence so far outside range that it demonstrated error - s3 Misuse of Drugs Act 2001 (Tas) - held: sentence was not unreasonable or plainly unjust - appeal dismissed.
Sweetman
Poem for Friday (Recitation here by Thomas Hellier)
The Late Worm
By Kay Ryan

The worms
which had been
thick are thin
upon the ground
now that it's gotten
later. They stick
against the path,
their pink chapped
and their inching
labored. It's a
matter of moisture
isn't it? Time, a
measure of wet,
shrinking, the
drier you get.

Kay Ryan