A daily Bulletin listing our choice of Decisions of Superior Courts of Australia.
Benchmark

Banking


Monday, 9 February 2015

Executive Summary (One Minute Read)
Stratton v Bowles (No 2) (FCA) - bankruptcy - creditor’s petition based on Family Court costs order - sequestration order set aside - matter remitted
In the matter of Anglican Development Fund Diocese of Bathurst Board (recs and mgrs apptd) (NSWSC) - corporations - receivers granted leave to make interim distribution to creditors
Dipic v Bunning (QCA) - summary dismissal - limitations - application for leave to appeal to be dismissed if failure to comply with security for costs order
Kordamentha Pty Ltd & Calibre Capital Ltd v LM Investment Management Ltd (in liq); Park & Mullerv Kordamentha Pty Ltd & Calibre Capital Ltd (QSC) - equity - trusts and trustees - prosecution and defence of proceedings - directions
Summaries With Link (Five Minute Read)
Stratton v Bowles (No 2) [2015] FCA 43
Federal Court of Australia
Beach J
Bankruptcy - Federal Circuit Court judge made sequestration order against appellant’s estate on petition of respondent - Family Court costs order against appellant in respondent’s favour formed basis for bankruptcy notice - creditor’s petition filed on basis of act of bankruptcy by non-compliance with notice - appellant sought to challenge costs order - other sufficient cause - s52(2)(b) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) - relevance of defamation proceedings in New South Wales - held: primary judge did not sufficiently analyse effect and significance of appellant’s challenge to Family Court costs order - primary judge did not fully engage with question whether there was leave to appeal application which embraced Family Court costs order and merits of potential challenge - no discussion of adjournment of respondent’s petition to await outcome of Family Court challenge - sequestration order set aside - matter remitted for determination.
Stratton
In the matter of Anglican Development Fund Diocese of Bathurst Board (recs and mgrs apptd) [2015] NSWSC 6
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Black J
Corporations - plaintiffs in capacity as receivers and managers sought permission to make interim distribution to creditors of fund in accordance with distribution schedule - receivers claimed submitted proof of debt lodged by bank reflected its judgment debt against fund, that bank’s proof of debt admitted; that issues remained to be resolved in respect of four other claimants and that receiver proposed to put aside sufficient funds to pay claimants whose proofs of debt were deferred if proofs ultimately admitted - ss12CA, 12CB, 12GF & 12GM Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) - ss180, 181, 182, 420(1), 420(2), 420(2)(k), 423, 536, 1317H & 1321 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - held: Court satisfied receivers’ approach to identification of persons to whom interim distribution should be made or set aside pending adjudication of claims was appropriate - leave granted to make interim distribution subject to condition.
In the matter of Anglican Development Fund Diocese of Bathurst Board
Dipic v Bunning [2014] QCA 338
Court of Appeal of Queensland
Holmes JA
Summary judgment - limitations - security for costs - applicant filed statement of claim in relation to alleged agreement that he and wife would give respondents money to help them buy house or land - respondents obtained summary judgment on basis statement of claim out of time - applicant sought to appeal - primary judge ordered applicant to pay security for costs - respondents sought to have application for leave to appeal dismissed - applicant sought to have order for security set aside or varied so that security did not have to be provided until police investigation of claims against respondents completed - held: applicant had limited prospects of success on appeal - no basis to vary or set aside order for security for costs - Court not prepared to dismiss application for leave to appeal out of hand - unless applicant complied with order for security for costs by certain date, application for leave would be deemed to be dismissed with costs.
Dipic
Kordamentha Pty Ltd & Calibre Capital Ltd v LM Investment Management Ltd (in liq); Park & Mullerv Kordamentha Pty Ltd & Calibre Capital Ltd [2015] QSC 4
Supreme Court of Queensland
Martin J
Equity - trusts and trustees - two applications under s96 Trusts Act 1973 - application for directions whether or not proceedings should be brought against respondents - application by first respondent that if direction sought was given, it should defend proceeding - statement of facts - service - costs estimate - merits of proposed proceeding - necessity for leave to proceed against company in liquidation - s471B Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - held: directions given in each application with respect to prosecution and defence of proceedings in accordance with applications.
Kordamentha Pty Ltd & Calibre Capital Ltd