Stewart v Moden (VSC) - wills and estates - misappropriated money - deceased’s mental capacity - defendant’s share of deceased’s estate to be retained by plaintiff for benefit of residuary beneficiaries |
Ferrari Estate Holdings Pty Ltd v Sovereign Resort Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) (QSC) - dismissal - claim against second and third defendants dismissed for want of prosecution |
Summaries With Link (Five Minute Read) |
Stewart v Moden [2015] VSC 369 Supreme Court of Victoria McMillan J Wills and estates - plaintiff beneficiary and executor of deceased’s estate sought declarations as to defendant’s entitlements under deceased’s Will - plaintiff sought that defendant’s entitlement be offset from money misappropriated by defendant during deceased’s lifetime - deceased’s mental capacity - rule in Cherry v Boultbee [1839] EngR 1099 - defendant’s inability to repay estate - held: even if deceased knew how her assets were being spent by defendant it was unlikely his spending was for deceased’s benefit - plaintiff entitled to declaration sought that defendant’s share of estate be retained by plaintiff, as executor for benefit of residuary beneficiaries other than defendant. Stewart
|
Ferrari Estate Holdings Pty Ltd v Sovereign Resort Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] QSC 220 Supreme Court of Queensland Henry J Dismissal - want of prosecution - plaintiff alleged its land and building flooded and damaged as result of development works undertaken by second and third defendants at hotel for first defendant owner of hotel - Court dismissed plaintiff’s claim against first defendant for want of prosecution - second and third defendants sought dismissal of claim against them for want of prosecution - held: plaintiff engaged in prolonged delays - plaintiff failed to comply with implied undertaking to proceed in expeditious way - explanation for delay inadequate -case did not have good prospects of success and was far short of being ready to be listed for trial - plaintiff had long considered defendants should wait for case to be progressed when it suited plaintiff’s director to progress it - claim against second and third defendants dismissed for want of prosecution. Ferrari
|