|DH MB Pty Ltd v Manning Motel Pty Ltd (NSWCA) - leases - breach of collateral contract and covenant to repair - damages - appeal dismissed (I B C)
|Bartlett v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (NSWSC) - contracts -serious misconduct by employee of bank - bank entitled to terminate contract (I B)
|Executors of the Estate of the late Valerie Marshall Olsen v Second East Holdings Pty Ltd t/as Sotheby's Australia (NSWSC) - conversion - injunction restraining auction house from disposing selling or transferring painting refused (I B)
|Kaur v Victorian WorkCover Authority (VSCA) - accident compensation - low back injury did not constitute serious injury - appeal dismissed (I G)
|Poole v Barrow (VSC) - succession - testator's family maintenance - de facto partner of deceased granted life interest in home (B)
|Shorten v Bell-Gallie (QCA) - administrative law - no error in appointment of administrator of permanently disabled woman - leave to appeal refused (B G)
|Margush v Maddeford (SASCFC) - contract for sale of house - special conditions - invalid termination of contract - damages refused - appeal dismissed (B)
|Summaries With Link (Five Minute Read)
|DH MB Pty Ltd v Manning Motel Pty Ltd  NSWCA 396
Court of Appeal of New South Wales
Meagher, Barrett & Gleeson JJA
Contract - first appellant (DHMB) owned motel - DHMB leased motel to respondent - lease terminated - second appellant (DHBI) owned and operated lodge - third appellant (Mr Duffy) was sole director of and shareholder in DHMB and DHBI - respondent sued appellants for breach of collateral contract and covenant to keep premises in good state of repair - primary judge found Mr Duffy on behalf of DHBI had promised lessee that if it lessee entered lease, DHBI would purchase accommodation from lessee - primary judge awarded damages to lessee for breach of collateral agreement -primary judge also held that there was a breach of covenant in relation to external wooden staircase and awarded damages for the breach - held: collateral contract formed between DHBI and lessee constituted by offer and subsequent acceptance - DHBI bound to terms of its offered promise to purchase accommodation - primary judge did not err in determining the measure of damages to be awarded for breach of the covenant to repair - appeal dismissed.
DH MB Pty Ltd (I B C)
|Bartlett v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd  NSWSC 1662
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Contracts - damages - bank purported to terminate plaintiff's employment without notice on basis of serious misconduct - plaintiff sued bank for damages for breach of contract alleging he was not guilty of serious misconduct and that bank not entitled to terminate his employment without notice - held: Court satisfied person who was relevant mind of bank held opinion that plaintiff was responsible for sending doctored email to journalist - common ground that this amounted to serious misconduct within meaning of contract - bank entitled to terminate plaintiff's employment without notice - bank not required to establish underlying fact of serious misconduct - even if it were so required bank had established to requisite standard that the plaintiff was responsible for the doctored email to journalist - bank entitled to terminate contract - judgment for bank.
Bartlett (I B)
|Executors of the Estate of the late Valerie Marshall Olsen v Second East Holdings Pty Ltd t/as Sotheby's Australia  NSWSC 1675
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Conversion - proceedings concerning painting by Dr John Olsen - plaintiffs were children of Olsen's late wife and executors of her estate - defendant was auction house - plaintiffs claimed estate owned painting - plaintiffs sought to bring action for conversion against person in possession of painting and to seek delivery up of painting - plaintiffs sought an injunction restraining auction house from disposing, selling or in any way transferring painting until further order - held: Court not satisfied plaintiffs established prima facie case or serious question such as would warrant grant of an interlocutory injunction - plaintiffs granted a chance to adduce further evidence from Dr Olsen and seek to renew application in the light of evidence - interlocutory injunction refused - application adjourned.
Executors of the Estate of the late Valerie Marshall Olsen (I B)
|Kaur v Victorian WorkCover Authority  VSCA 300
Court of Appeal of Victoria
Tate, Santamaria & Kyrou JJA
Accident compensation - appellant sought leave to bring proceedings to recover damages for injuries sustained in work-related incident pursuant to s134AB(16)(b) Accident Compensation Act 1985 (Vic) - appellant alleged she suffered serious injury and identified relevant body function as injury to her back - primary judge dismissed application - primary judge found appellant did suffer low back injury but was not persuaded that the pain and suffering consequences could be fairly described as being more than significant or marked, and as being at least very considerable for purposes of s134AB(38) - held: trial judge did not err in failing to hold that judicial notice could be taken of pregnancy pain - contention could not be sustained that trial judge denied appellant natural justice in not warning her that she would not make a finding that pregnancy pain be taken into account because it was not supported by medical evidence - appeal dismissed.
Kaur (I G)
|Poole v Barrow  VSC 576
Supreme Court of Victoria
Succession - testator's family maintenance - deceased died intestate - plaintiff de facto partner of deceased sought further provision from deceased's estate for her proper maintenance and support pursuant to s91 Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic) - defendant accepted deceased had a responsibility to provide for plaintiff and that the extent of her provision under intestacy laws was not sufficient to satisfy responsibility - extent and nature of further provision to be ordered - held: life interest in home was sufficient further provision for plaintiff - parties to be heard on appropriate form of orders.
|Shorten v Bell-Gallie  QCA 300
Court of Appeal of Queensland
Fraser JA; North & Flanagan JJ
Administrative law - guardianship - applicant was fiancée of permanently disabled woman - members of woman's family appointed as her administrators under Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld) - family members replaced with Public Trustee by QCAT - Public Trustee replaced with respondent - applicant's application for review of respondent' s appointment dismissed without hearing in accordance with practice direction - applicant appealed to Appeal Division of QCAT and unsuccessfully sought to introduce new evidence - appeal dismissed - applicant sought leave to appeal on basis he was denied natural justice - that there was failure to take into account relevant considerations - that irrelevant considerations were taken into account - that Appeal Tribunal misconstrued s146 Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) - held: no arguable error of law established on the part of the Appeal Tribunal - leave to appeal refused - application to adduce fresh evidence refused.
Shorten (B G)
|Margush v Maddeford  SASCFC 129
Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia
Vanstone, Peek & Parker JJ
Contract - purchaser signed contract to purchase vendor's property - special conditions provided sale subject to purchaser obtaining finance by certain date and that either party could terminate after that certain date, with purchaser only being liable for damages if she had failed to use best endeavours - purchaser unable to obtain finance - vendor terminated contract and sold property for less than contract price - vendor claimed difference in sale price, together with costs associated with second sale - primary judge dismissed claim - primary judge found purchaser had used best endeavours and appeal conduct on that basis - held: special conditions did not constitute condition precedent to operation of contract - providing purchaser used best endeavours, contract at all times remained conditional upon approval for finance being obtained - inability of purchaser to obtain finance did not bring contract to an end - rather, it became voidable at instance of either party - since neither party had validly terminated contract, it remained on foot - special conditions were operative - purchaser free to attempt to obtain finance - appeal dismissed.