|Clasul Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (FCA) - representative proceedings arising from equine influenza outbreak - amendments to pleadings allowed
|Firebird Global Master Fund II Ltd v Republic of Nauru (NSWCA) - registration of foreign judgment against Nauru invalid
|Farr v Insurance Australia Ltd t/as NRMA Insurance Ltd (NSWSC) - motor accidents compensation - no error in assessment by medical assessor
|Villella v Telstra Corporation Ltd (VSCA) - negligence - legal practitioners - competency of appeal - security for costs
|Brazis v Rosati (VSCA) - arbitration - leave to appeal against stay of part of proceeding and referral of dispute to arbitration
|Dale v Clayton Utz (a firm) (No 2) (VSC) - partnership - privileges against self-incrimination - rule of practice in Protean Holdings - proceedings split
|Summaries With Link (Five Minute Read)
|Clasul Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia  FCA 1133
Federal Court of Australia
Representative proceedings - pleadings - applicants claimed damages from Commonwealth for financial losses following outbreak of equine influenza - applicants alleged Commonwealth had both direct and vicarious liability - applicants sought leave to amend originating application and statement of claim - applicants conceded new cause of action in 'Turner' amendments time-barred but contended it arose out of substantially same facts as causes of actions currently pleaded - Commonwealth contended 'New Procedure' amendments should not be allowed because they did not contain any allegations material to pleaded causes of action - held: 'Turner' amendments arose out of substantially same facts as already pleaded - discretionary factors favoured amendments - Court satisfied 'New Procedures' amendments should be treated as material facts - amendments allowed.
Clasul Pty Ltd
|Firebird Global Master Fund II Ltd v Republic of Nauru  NSWCA 360
Court of Appeal of New South Wales
Bathurst CJ; Beazley P & Basten JA
Judgments and orders - sovereign immunity - Firebird obtained judgment against Nauru in Japan - Firebird sought to register Japanese judgment in NSW Supreme Court pursuant to Foreign Judgments Act 1991 (Cth) - application was by summons - summons not served on Nauru - Japanese judgment registered - Firebird obtained garnishee order - primary judge held judgment should not have been registered and garnishee order should be set aside - held: service requirements set out in Foreign Judgments Act and Foreign States Immunities Act 1985 (Cth) could be read harmoniously so that the former did not impliedly repeal requirements in the latter - failure to adhere to service requirements set out in Immunities Act meant registration of Japanese judgment should be set aside - proceeding in s9 of the Immunities Act covered application to register a foreign judgment and therefore immunity operated - Nauru did not waive its immunity - exception to immunity did not apply because proceedings concerned application to register foreign judgment not a commercial transaction - appeal dismissed.
Firebird Global Master Fund II Ltd
|Farr v Insurance Australia Ltd t/as NRMA Insurance Ltd  NSWSC 1435
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Motor accidents compensation - plaintiff sought judicial review of assessment of medical assessor appointed under Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) - plaintiff claimed assessor ignored relevant material and that reasons were inadequate - relevance of dietary restrictions - held: Court not persuaded any challenges to assessment made out - making of assessment was open to assessor - assessor was an independent medical expert in his field - assessment made within expert professional judgment - assessor took an oral history, undertook an examination, reviewed documentation provided, set out findings, and made an assessment - sufficient reasons provided for assessment - no error of law established - summons dismissed.
|Villella v Telstra Corporation Ltd  VSCA 263
Court of Appeal of Victoria
Kyrou JA & Ginnane AJA
Negligence - legal practitioners - security for costs - competency of appeal - appellant was proprietor of house - appellant received insurance payments in respect of water damage to property - appellant complained to respondent about water damage allegedly caused by works negligently performed - respondent denied it carried out the works and denied liability - County Court judge found in favour of respondent - respondent sought dismissal of appellant's appeal for incompetence and security for costs - appellant's solicitors sought leave to file notice that firm had ceased to act for appellant - held: certain grounds of appeal dealt with interlocutory rulings in respect of which appellant had not sought leave to appeal - notice of appeal also raised substantive grounds of appeal - application to dismiss appeal as incompetent referred for hearing by Court constituted to hear appeal - application to file notice of ceasing to act granted - there was risk that appellant's financial obligations would deplete her net assets and render her incapable of meeting future costs order - security for costs granted.
|Brazis v Rosati  VSCA 264
Court of Appeal of Victoria
Kyrou JA & Ginnane AJA
Arbitration - applicants sought relief under oppression and derivative action provisions of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - applicants sought leave to appeal against trial judge's order staying claim pursuant to s8 Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic) - trial judge held parties to proceeding who were also parties to a Shareholders' and Unitholders' Agreement containing an arbitration clause could not continue oppression claim because it fell within arbitration clause - held: application for leave to appeal raised important questions of law relating to interrelationship between Corporations Act and Commercial Arbitration Act - on basis of nature and importance of matters raised in proposed notice of appeal, Court satisfied trial judge's decision attended with sufficient doubt to justify grant of leave to appeal - inappropriate for Court to analyse parties' submissions on correctness of judge's reasoning and on grounds of appeal - leave to appeal granted.
|Dale v Clayton Utz (a firm) (No 2)  VSC 517
Supreme Court of Victoria
Partnership - privileges against self-incrimination - former partner of firm sought to challenge decision made by Board requiring plaintiff to leave partnership - plaintiff made claim for breach of partnership agreement - plaintiff sought orders for split of proceedings on basis of principle in Protean Holdings - reasonable likelihood of criminal or civil penalty proceedings - held: Court satisfied orders sought by plaintiff to split proceedings should be granted - defendant directly alleged serious professional misconduct which could lead to obvious civil penalties and also serious criminal conduct which could lead to criminal charges - privileges available even though it was a non-penalty proceeding - privilege against witness being compelled to answer questions which may tend to incriminate witness extended to pleadings and other interlocutory process - orders made.