A daily Bulletin listing our choice of Decisions of Superior Courts of Australia.


Wednesday, 25 February 2015

Executive Summary (One Minute Read)
BlueScope Steel Ltd v Cartwright (NSWCA) – work injury damages – truck accident - excessive speed – BlueScope Steel and insurer not liable – appeal allowed
McGeown v NSW Land and Housing Corporation (NSWCA) – landlord and tenant – breach of lease by ceasing personally to occupy premises – appeal dismissed
Clarke v State of NSW (NSWCA) – pleadings – bias – leave to appeal from dismissal of proceedings refused
Gardner v Mattila (NTCA) – evidence – equity – dispute arising from development of store and caravan park – appeal dismissed – cross-appeal allowed
Summaries With Link (Five Minute Read)
BlueScope Steel Ltd v Cartwright [2015] NSWCA 25
Court of Appeal of New South Wales
Beazley P; Ward & Emmett JJA
Work injury damages - workers compensation - motor vehicle accident - employer contracted with steel manufacturer for transport of steel in containers - truck driver was driving prime mover with attached trailer containing heavy container - truck driver claimed damages for injuries when trailer lurched and rolled - Court held accident caused by tipping of unstable load and that both manufacturer and employer breached duty of care to truck driver - manufacturer had primary liability due to its inadequate packing system, which employer was contractually required to follow - liability apportioned at 85% for steel manufacturer - 15% for employer - held: accident would not have occurred unless prime mover travelling at speed in excess of limit - truck driver failed to establish inadequacy of wedges caused accident - truck driver entirely responsible for injuries - appeal allowed.
BlueScope Steel Ltd
McGeown v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2015] NSWCA 23
Court of Appeal of New South Wales
McColl, Macfarlan & Sackville AJA
Landlord and tenant - parties entered lease in respect of residential unit - applicant sought leave to appeal from decision of Appeal Panel of New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal to dismiss appeal from Tribunal’s termination of residential tenancy agreement on basis applicant had ceased personally to occupy the premises - Appeal Panel upheld Tribunal’s decision that applicant was in breach of lease and that respondent entitled to order requiring applicant to give up possession - construction of lease - ceased personally to occupy the premises - held: at time respondent served Notice of Termination, applicant had been incarcerated for about eight months - applicant had ceased to be in personal occupation of premises and thereby breached the lease - appeal dismissed.
Clarke v State of NSW [2015] NSWCA 27
Court of Appeal of New South Wales
McColl & Ward JJA
Pleadings - applicant sought leave to appeal from dismissal of statements of claim in malicious prosecution proceedings and conspiracy proceedings (conspiracy judgment), and dismissal of amended statement of claim in wrongful arrest proceedings (bias judgment) - held: proposed appeal from conspiracy judgment hopeless and out of time - applicant did not demonstrate any arguable error in bias judgment - summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Gardner v Mattila [2015] NTCA 1
Court of Appeal of the Northern Territory
Kelly, Barr & Hiley JJ
Evidence - equity - parties entered lease agreement to develop store and caravan park on land which respondent inherited from father’s estate - development financed by sale of parcels of land which respondent also inherited - parcels sold by first appellant using power of attorney granted by respondent - respondent made various claims against first appellant - primary judge found in favour of respondent on undue influence claims, claims for misappropriation of money, negligent sale of land and claim for declaration that lease was void - primary judge gave judgment for first appellant on quantum meruit claim - parties appealed and cross-appealed - first appellant’s essential complaint was that trial judge accepted respondent’s submission that Mrs Gardner had lied in giving evidence - held: no reason why trial judge ought not to have accepted respondent’s evidence - appeal dismissed - cross appeal against first appellant concerning alleged breaches of duty in relation to trust money spent on building works which were uncommercial allowed.