Insurance Friday, 13 March 2015 View in browser

A daily Bulletin listing our choice of Decisions of Superior Courts of Australia.
Benchmark

Insurance

Click here to listen to the Benchmark radio
Executive Summary (One Minute Read)
BHP Billiton Ltd v Dunning (NSWCA) - workers compensation - worker contracted mesothelioma during employment - employer liable
Rinehart v Rinehart (NSWSC) - preliminary discovery - subpoena issued to third party not set aside - notice of produce set aside
French v Fraser (NSWSC) - pleadings - defamation - objections to form of pleading in statement of claim
Giedo van der Garde BV v Sauber Motorsport AG (VSC) - arbitration - no grounds for refusal to enforce foreign arbitral award
Goldus Pty Ltd v Australian Mining Pty Ltd (SASC) - joint venture - joint venturer not required to give notice of proposed sale of shares
Summaries With Link (Five Minute Read)
BHP Billiton Ltd v Dunning [2015] NSWCA 42
Court of Appeal of New South Wales
Basten, McFarlane & Meagher JJA
Workers compensation - worker suffering from mesothelioma claimed illness caused by inhalation of asbestos dust and fibre in course of employment with BHP - worker claimed BHP was negligent and breached its statutory duties - Tribunal found in worker’s favour - s3B(1)(b) Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) - held: primary judge did not err in finding BHP breached duty of care because it did not take available practical alternative measures which would have reduced worker’s exposure to asbestos - no error in admission of former employee’s evidence, in finding worker exposed to asbestos dust and fibre during course of employment or in findings concerning available practical alternative measures - appeal dismissed.
BHP Billiton Ltd
Rinehart v Rinehart [2015] NSWSC 205
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Darke J
Preliminary discovery - applications to set aside subpoena and notice to produce - plaintiffs had sought orders that defendants provide preliminary discovery pursuant to r5.3 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) - plaintiffs issued subpoena directed to non-party - second defendant issued notice to produce directed to plaintiffs - overlap between documents sought - abuse of process - held: plaintiffs in this case, in issuing the subpoena, have done so for the legitimate purpose of assisting their case under r5.3(1)(a) - no abuse of process - subpoena not set aside - notice to produce failed to comply with Equity Division Practice Note 11 - there were defects in form of notice - notice set aside.
Rinehart
French v Fraser [2014] NSWSC 1937
Supreme Court of New South Wales
McCallum J
Pleadings - defamation - action arising out of publications on website - defendant objected to form of pleading of plaintiff’s statement of claim - whether imputations capable of conveying matter complained of - held: certain imputations struck out - Court not persuaded one imputation was incapable of arising, or that a particular of aggravated damages should be struck out on basis of inconsistency with other particulars - objections determined.
French
Giedo van der Garde BV v Sauber Motorsport AG [2015] VSC 80
Supreme Court of Victoria
Croft J
Arbitration - applicants sought enforcement of foreign arbitral award - critical dispositive provision granted order requiring respondent to refrain from taking action to deprive first applicant of entitlement to participate in the 2015 Formula One Season as nominated race driver - common ground that threshold requirements of s8 International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) satisfied - whether respondent could prove circumstances in ss8(5) and (7) as grounds for refusal of enforcement - scope of submission to arbitration - non-arbitrability - public policy - held: no grounds to refuse to enforce award - award enforced.
Giedo van der Garde BV
Goldus Pty Ltd v Australian Mining Pty Ltd [2015] SASC 32
Supreme Court of South Australia
Parker J
Joint venture agreement - plaintiff and first defendant were joint venturers - second defendant sole shareholder of first defendant contracted to sell shares to third party - plaintiff contended that, under agreement, first defendant required to give notice of proposed sale and that plaintiff had pre-emptive right to purchase first defendant’s participating interest in joint venture on the terms of sale - plaintiff also contended implied term of agreement required joint venturer could not sell interest to unrelated party incapable of discharging rights and obligations required of joint venture - evidence of prior negotiations - it goes without saying - held: clauses of joint venture uncertain, void and severed from agreement - first defendant not required to give notice of share sale - no term implied in agreement - action dismissed.
Goldus Pty Ltd
Passers-by
by Carl Sandburg
 
Passers-by,
Out of your many faces
Flash memories to me
Now at the day end
Away from the sidewalks
Where your shoe soles traveled
And your voices rose and blent
To form the city’s afternoon roar
Hindering an old silence.
 
Passers-by,
I remember lean ones among you,
Throats in the clutch of a hope,
Lips written over with strivings,
Mouths that kiss only for love,
Records of great wishes slept with,
        Held long
And prayed and toiled for:
 
        Yes,
Written on
Your mouths
And your throats
I read them
When you passed by.
 
Carl Sandburg