|Cavric v Willoughby City Council (NSWCA) - highways - negligence - customer injured in shopping centre - car park did not constitute a public road - appeal allowed
|Heyday5 Pty Ltd v Cockram Constructions NSW Pty Ltd (NSWSC) - interlocutory injunction restraining defendants from calling on performance bond granted
|Santos Offshore Pty Ltd v Apache Oil Australia Pty Ltd (WASC) - contract - joint venture - notice issued pursuant to clause of joint venture agreement invalid - declaration
|Moran v Atrum Coal NL (WASC) - injunction - confidential information - extension of injunction refused
|Summaries With Link (Five Minute Read)
|Cavric v Willoughby City Council  NSWCA 182
Court of Appeal of New South Wales
Basten, Meagher & Emmett JJA
Highways - negligence - real property - appellant wheeling trolley laden with shopping and child - front wheel on trolley hit “pothole” - trolley tilted - appellant inured when she fell seeking to stop trolley overturning - appellant sued Council for negligent maintenance of car park - trial judge dismissed claim on basis car park was public road by operation of s249(1) Roads Act 1993 with result Council protected by s45 Civil Liability Act 2002 - if car park did not constitute public road appeal must be upheld - statutory scheme - continued operation of common law - whether conveyance effected dedication of a road - evidence of public use - ‘is evidence that the place is or forms part of a public road’ - held: trial judge misunderstood s249(1) as providing freestanding test as to whether place was public road - s249 was no more than an evidentiary provision describing evidence which was admissible to prove a place was or formed part of that public road - s249 was subject to constraint imposed by s178 Conveyancing Act 1919 - in circumstances where there was no other evidence besides public use, trial judge should have found status of place where accident occurred as a public road was not established - appeal allowed.
|Heyday5 Pty Ltd v Cockram Constructions NSW Pty Ltd  NSWSC 884
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Injunction - plaintiff subcontracted by defendants in relation to project - plaintiff sought to restrain first and second defendants from calling on performance bond - final relief sought by plaintiff was that defendants "return" bond on basis they were bound to release it on achievement of practical completion of the sub-contract - held: Court satisfied there was serious question to be tried whether there had been Practical Completion and plaintiff now entitled to return of bond - strong prima facie case for relief - balance of convenience was in plaintiff’s favour - interlocutory injunction granted.
|Santos Offshore Pty Ltd v Apache Oil Australia Pty Ltd  WASC 242
Supreme Court of Western Australia
Contract - joint venture - dispute concerning validity of notice issued by defendants pursuant to clause of joint venture for exploitation of petroleum production licence - plaintiff claimed some terms and conditions did not comply with requirements of clause with result notices or challenged conditions invalid - plaintiff sought declarations of invalidity and orders for specific performance requiring defendants to serve notice which complied with clause’s requirements - right of pre-emption - held: challenged conditions failed to comply with clause’s requirements - notices invalid - Court not persuaded it was appropriate case for orders for specific performance - declaration granted.
|Moran v Atrum Coal NL [No 4]  WASC 241
Supreme Court of Western Australia
Injunction - confidential information - plaintiffs sought extension of injunction restraining defendant from disclosing information concerning loan agreements and securities plaintiffs entered, secured by securities in defendant - held: obligation to notify market operator of the information had arisen under s674 Corporations Act 2001 - Court not satisfied injunction sought by plaintiffs would not require defendant to contravene s674 - inappropriate to grant injunction - extension of injunction refused.