|Commissioner of State Taxation v T & S Liapis Pty Ltd (SASCFC) - land tax - respondent entitled to primary producer exemption under Land Tax Act 1936 (SA) - appeal dismissed
|Pilton Holdings Pty Ltd v Essential Beauty Franchising WA Pty Ltd (No 2) (SASC) - stay - contract - stay of judgment granted pending outcome of application for leave to appeal to High Court
|Re The Estate of Young ; Ex Parte Young (WASC) - Wills and estates - probate of deceased’s informal Will granted - appeal allowed
|Summaries With Link (Five Minute Read)
|Commissioner of State Taxation v T & S Liapis Pty Ltd  SASCFC 151
Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia
Gray, Sulan & Stanley JJ
Land tax - respondent owned land - respondent subdivided land - some hectares subdivided into residential lots - remaining hectares used as olive grove - all but one residential lot sold - respondent’s shareholder worked full time on olive grove - respondent sold olives and olive oil from olive grove cultivated with respondent’s machinery - significant earthworks and grafting had taken place to enable grove’s expansion - primary judge allowed appeal against land tax assessment in respect of olive grove - held: primary judge correct to conclude respondent was conducting business of primary production and that shareholder was engaged in business on substantially full time basis - primary judge did not err in construction of s5(10)(g)(vi)(A) Land Tax Act 1936 (SA) - respondent entitled to primary producer exemption under s5(10)(g)(vi) - appeal dismissed.
Commissioner of State Taxation
|Pilton Holdings Pty Ltd v Essential Beauty Franchising WA Pty Ltd (No 2)  SASC 172
Supreme Court of South Australia
Stay - contract - judgment entered in favour of respondents in amount - judgment upheld on appeal - applicants sought special leave to appeal to High Court - applicants sought stay of enforcement and operation of judgment - if stay refused, second applicant likely to be declared bankrupt and applicant wound up - applicants therefore would be likely to be denied opportunity to have High Court application decided - held: exceptional circumstances warranting stay - no material prejudice to respondents - balance of convenience in favour of applicants - stay granted subject to undertaking.
|Re The Estate of Young ; Ex Parte Young  WASC 409
Supreme Court of Western Australia
Wills and estates - appellants were deceased’s brothers - appellants appealed pursuant to r5 Non-contentious Probate Rules 1967 (WA) against Registrars’ decisions/requirements to effect that appellants provide further evidence and submissions in support of application for grant of probate of deceased’s informal Will - held: Court satisfied informal Will embodied deceased’s settled testamentary intentions and that deceased intended document to operate as his Will - appeal allowed - appellants entitled to grant of probate of deceased’s informal Will.